↓ Skip to main content

A novel behavioral model that discriminates between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor activation

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A novel behavioral model that discriminates between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor activation
Published in
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, May 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00767-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), a serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C receptor agonist, elicits shaking behaviors in rodents, which have been reliably quantified as behavioral correlates of 5-HT2A receptor activation. Such studies are lacking in the rabbit. As part of our research examining the role of the 5-HT2 receptor in rabbits, we analyzed the behavioral effects of systemically administered DOI in rabbits. DOI (0.01-3 micromol/kg) or vehicle was injected, and two distinct behaviors, head bobs (vertical head movements) and body shakes (wet dog shakes), were counted for 90 min following the injection. DOI dose-dependently increased the number of head bobs and body shakes. The selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin (1-3 micromol/kg), 1 h before DOI (0.3 micromol/kg) challenge, significantly attenuated head bobs, but not body shakes. In contrast, the selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonists SDZ SER 082 (1-3 micromol/kg) and SB 206553 (1 micromol/kg) 30 min before challenge, significantly reduced body shakes but not head bobs produced by the same dose of DOI. This study establishes that, in rabbits, DOI mediates head bobs via 5-HT2A receptors and body shakes via 5-HT2C receptors. Thus, the rabbit provides a novel behavioral assay that discriminates between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor activation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Other 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 26%
Neuroscience 4 21%
Psychology 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#12,425,541
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#1,661
of 4,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,651
of 178,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.