↓ Skip to main content

Impaired central mediation of the arterial baroreflex in chronic renal hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, May 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impaired central mediation of the arterial baroreflex in chronic renal hypertension
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, May 1984
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.246.5.h720
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

After 6 wk of renal hypertension in rabbits, the arterial baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) is impaired but the baroreflex control of lumbar sympathetic nerve activity ( LSNA ) is preserved. This selective impairment may reflect a predominant abnormality in the baroreceptors. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that renal hypertension of longer duration may impair baroreflex control of LSNA through a defect in the central nervous system mediation of the reflex. Four months after induction of renal hypertension, baroreflex responses were determined during increases in arterial pressure with intravenous phenylephrine or decreases in pressure with vena caval occlusion under chloralose-urethan anesthesia. Reflex control of LSNA and HR was impaired markedly in hypertensive rabbits. Reflex inhibition of LSNA and HR in response to afferent electrical stimulation of the left aortic depressor nerve (all arterial baroreceptor afferents cut) was attenuated in hypertensive in contrast to normotensive rabbits. This attenuation was noted when the medullated fibers only were stimulated or when both medullated and nonmedullated fibers were stimulated. We conclude that baroreflex control of LSNA that is preserved after 6 wk of hypertension is impaired after 4 mo of hypertension. The impairment reflects an abnormality in the central nervous system mediation of the reflex.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2015.
All research outputs
#12,347,312
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#2,821
of 7,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,376
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them