↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of disease severity based on SMN2 copy number in adults with spinal muscular atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Muscle & Nerve, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An analysis of disease severity based on SMN2 copy number in adults with spinal muscular atrophy
Published in
Muscle & Nerve, September 2009
DOI 10.1002/mus.21350
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of SMN2 copy number on disease severity in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), we stratified 45 adult SMA patients based on SMN2 copy number (3 vs. 4 copies). Patients with 3 copies had an earlier age of onset and lower spinal muscular atrophy functional rating scale (SMAFRS) scores and were more likely to be non-ambulatory. There was, however, no difference between the groups in quantitative muscle strength or pulmonary function testing. Functional scale may be a more discriminating outcome measure for SMA clinical trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#987
of 3,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,012
of 99,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.