↓ Skip to main content

Cystic fibrosis pathogens survive for extended periods within cough-generated droplet nuclei

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cystic fibrosis pathogens survive for extended periods within cough-generated droplet nuclei
Published in
Thorax, April 2018
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211567
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The airborne route is a potential pathway in the person-to-person transmission of bacterial strains among cystic fibrosis (CF) populations. In this cross-sectional study, we investigate the physical properties and survival of common non-Pseudomonas aeruginosaCF pathogens generated during coughing. We conclude that Gram-negative bacteria andStaphylococcus aureusare aerosolised during coughing, can travel up to 4 m and remain viable within droplet nuclei for up to 45 min. These results suggest that airborne person-to-person transmission is plausible for the CF pathogens we measured.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,659,148
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#2,839
of 7,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,780
of 372,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.