↓ Skip to main content

Distribution and Conservation Standing of West Virginia Crayfishes

Overview of attention for article published in Southeastern Naturalist, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution and Conservation Standing of West Virginia Crayfishes
Published in
Southeastern Naturalist, June 2010
DOI 10.1656/058.009.s304
Authors

Zachary J. Loughman, Stuart A. Welsh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Southeastern Naturalist
#73
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,024
of 96,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Southeastern Naturalist
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them