↓ Skip to main content

Persistent Currents in Normal Metal Rings

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Persistent Currents in Normal Metal Rings
Published in
Science, October 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1178139
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quantum mechanics predicts that the equilibrium state of a resistive metal ring will contain a dissipationless current. This persistent current has been the focus of considerable theoretical and experimental work, but its basic properties remain a topic of controversy. The main experimental challenges in studying persistent currents have been the small signals they produce and their exceptional sensitivity to their environment. We have developed a technique for detecting persistent currents that allows us to measure the persistent current in metal rings over a wide range of temperatures, ring sizes, and magnetic fields. Measurements of both a single ring and arrays of rings agree well with calculations based on a model of non-interacting electrons.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 5%
Japan 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 175 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 24%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 133 69%
Engineering 12 6%
Materials Science 8 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2026.
All research outputs
#9,843,703
of 32,192,432 outputs
Outputs from Science
#55,780
of 92,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,695
of 139,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#297
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,192,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.