↓ Skip to main content

Self-Reported Health Status Predicts Other-Cause Mortality in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self-Reported Health Status Predicts Other-Cause Mortality in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11606-014-3171-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Guidelines recommend against treating localized prostate cancer (PCa) in men with a greater than 10-year life expectancy. However, physicians have difficulty accurately estimating life expectancy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,050,755
of 28,382,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,810
of 8,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,067
of 378,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#70
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,382,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.