↓ Skip to main content

Forbidden words

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Forbidden words
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x695549
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Misselbrook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 18 47%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Philosophy 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,013,982
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,392
of 4,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,165
of 333,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#58
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.