↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila asterless and Vertebrate Cep152 Are Orthologs Essential for Centriole Duplication

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Drosophila asterless and Vertebrate Cep152 Are Orthologs Essential for Centriole Duplication
Published in
Genetics, December 2008
DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.095141
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The centriole is the core structure of centrosome and cilium. Failure to restrict centriole duplication to once per cell cycle has serious consequences and is commonly observed in cancer. Despite its medical importance, the mechanism of centriole formation is poorly understood. Asl was previously reported to be a centrosomal protein essential for centrosome function. Here we identify mecD, a severe loss-of-function allele of the asl gene, and demonstrate that it is required for centriole and cilia formation. Similarly, Cep152, the Asl ortholog in vertebrates, is essential for cilia formation and its function can be partially rescued by the Drosophila Asl. The study of Asl localization suggests that it is closely associated with the centriole wall, but is not part of the centriole structure. By analyzing the biogenesis of centrosomes in cells depleted of Asl, we found that, while pericentriolar material (PCM) function is mildly affected, Asl is essential for daughter centriole formation. The clear absence of several centriolar markers in mecD mutants suggests that Asl is critical early in centriole duplication.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 27 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 32%
Chemistry 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#9,515,649
of 27,777,630 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#3,651
of 7,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,206
of 194,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,777,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.