You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tissue-specific Forkhead protein FOXA2 up-regulates SOX14 gene expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.01.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jelena Popovic, Andrijana Klajn, Isidora Petrovic, Milena Stevanovic |
| Abstract |
The expression of Sox14 gene in spinal cord explants was found to be regulated by Sonic hedgehog (SHH) in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that this signaling molecule might act as a regulator of Sox14-expressing interneuron differentiation. In the present study we identified the positive control element and provided the first evidence that FOXA2 is involved in up-regulation of SOX14 expression in HepG2 and U87MG cell lines. By functional analysis we demonstrated that mutation in FOXA2 binding site reduced the SOX14 reporter construct activity, and that FOXA2 over-expression increased endogenous SOX14 protein expression. Further, we have shown that human SOX14 expression is GLI1 dependent in U87MG cells and SHH-N dependent in U87MG and HepG2 cell lines. By applying siRNA silencing of FOXA2, we have demonstrated that upregulation of endogenous SOX14 gene expression by SHH is, at least in part, mediated by FOXA2. However, our data revealed that a positive regulatory region, containing functional FOXA2 site analyzed in this study, is not involved in mediation of SHH dependent SOX14 activation. Data presented here provide the initial insight into molecular mechanism underlying tissue and developmentally specific regulation of the SOX14 gene expression. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#6,104
of 19,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,788
of 173,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#51
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.