↓ Skip to main content

Opioid use following cervical spine surgery: trends and factors associated with long-term use

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Opioid use following cervical spine surgery: trends and factors associated with long-term use
Published in
Spine Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Limited or no data exist evaluating risk-factors associated with prolonged opioid use following cervical arthrodesis. To assess trends in post-operative narcotic use amongst preoperative opioid users (OU) versus non-opioid users (NOU), and identify factors associated with postoperative narcotic use at 1-year following cervical arthrodesis. Retrospective, observational study. 17,391 patients (OU: 52.4%) registered in the Humana Inc. claims dataset that underwent anterior (ACF) or posterior cervical fusions (PCF) between 2007-2015. Prolonged opioid usage defined as narcotic prescription filling at 1-year following cervical arthrodesis. Based on preoperative opioid-use, patients were identified as an OU (history of narcotic prescription filled within 3-months before surgery) or a NOU (no preoperative prescription). Rates of opioid use were evaluated pre-operatively for OU, and trended for 1-year post-operatively for both OU and NOU. Multivariable regression techniques investigated factors associated with the use of narcotics at 1-year following ACF and PCF. Based on the model findings, a web-based interactive app was developed to estimate 1-year postoperative risk of using narcotics following cervical arthrodesis: http://neuro-risk.com/opiod-use/ or https://www.neurosurgerycost.com/opioid/opioid_use RESULTS: Overall, 87.4% patients (n=15,204) underwent ACF while 12.6% (n=2187) underwent PCF. At one-month following surgery, 47.7% NOU and 82% OUs had a filled opioid prescription. At 3-months, rates of prescription opioids declined significantly to 7.8% in NOUs vs 50.5% in OUs, while plateauing at 6-12 month postoperative period (NOU:5.7-6.7%; OU:44.9-46.9%). At 1-year, significantly higher narcotic prescription filling rates was observed in OUs compared to NOUs (45.3% vs 6.3%;p<0.001). Preoperative opioid use was a significant driver of 1-year narcotic use following ACF (OR:7.02;p<0.001) and PCF (OR:6.98;p<0.001) along with younger age(<=50 years), history of drug-dependence and lower back pain. Over 50% patients used opioids prior to cervical arthrodesis. Postoperative opioid-use fell dramatically during the first 3-months in NOU, but nearly half of the pre-op opioid users will remain on narcotics at 1-year postop. Our findings serve as a baseline in identifying patients at risk for chronic use and encourage discontinuation of opioids prior to cervical spinal surgery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Other 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 48%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#2,346
of 4,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,685
of 372,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#33
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.