↓ Skip to main content

miR-200 Enhances Mouse Breast Cancer Cell Colonization to Form Distant Metastases

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
miR-200 Enhances Mouse Breast Cancer Cell Colonization to Form Distant Metastases
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007181
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of metastases involves the dissociation of cells from the primary tumor to penetrate the basement membrane, invade and then exit the vasculature to seed, and colonize distant tissues. The last step, establishment of macroscopic tumors at distant sites, is the least well understood. Four isogenic mouse breast cancer cell lines (67NR, 168FARN, 4TO7, and 4T1) that differ in their ability to metastasize when implanted into the mammary fat pad are used to model the steps of metastasis. Only 4T1 forms macroscopic lung and liver metastases. Because some miRNAs are dysregulated in cancer and affect cellular transformation, tumor formation, and metastasis, we examined whether changes in miRNA expression might explain the differences in metastasis of these cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 23%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,679,625
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,682
of 225,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,512
of 150,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#128
of 694 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 694 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.