↓ Skip to main content

Human connexin31.9, unlike its orthologous protein connexin30.2 in the mouse, is not detectable in the human cardiac conduction system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular & Cellular Cardiology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human connexin31.9, unlike its orthologous protein connexin30.2 in the mouse, is not detectable in the human cardiac conduction system
Published in
Journal of Molecular & Cellular Cardiology, December 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the human heart connexin(Cx)40, Cx43 and Cx45-containing gap junctional channels electrically couple cardiomyocytes, forming a functional syncytium. In the mouse heart, additionally, Cx30.2-containing gap junctions have been detected in the atrioventricular node where they are implicated, together with Cx45, in impulse delay. However, whether the human ortholog of Cx30.2, Cx31.9, is expressed in the human heart has not previously been investigated. We therefore generated Cx31.9 specific antibodies to test for the expression of Cx31.9 in the human heart. These antibodies recognized the Cx31.9 protein in HeLaCx31.9 transfectants by immunofluorescence and immunoblot analyses. However, we did not find punctate Cx31.9 specific immunofluorescence signals in the working myocardium or in the impulse generation and conduction system of adult or fetal human heart. Complementary immunoblot analyses did not reveal Cx31.9 protein in the adult atrial or ventricular myocardium. We conclude that the Cx31.9 protein, unlike its counterpart in the mouse, is not expressed in detectable quantities and is thus unlikely to contribute to the impulse generation and conduction system or the working myocardium of the human heart.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,425,541
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular & Cellular Cardiology
#1,362
of 3,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,816
of 250,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular & Cellular Cardiology
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.