↓ Skip to main content

First probable Australian cases of human infection with Rickettsia felis (cat‐flea typhus)

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Journal of Australia, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
First probable Australian cases of human infection with Rickettsia felis (cat‐flea typhus)
Published in
Medical Journal of Australia, January 2011
DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04145.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human infection with Rickettsia felis has been reported in most parts of the world, and R. felis has recently been confirmed in cat fleas in Western Australia. The clinical presentations of R. typhi and R. felis are similar, and in the past, the incidence of R. felis infection may have been underestimated. We describe the first reported cases of probable human R. felis infection in Australia. Two adults and three children in Victoria contracted a rickettsial disease after exposure to fleas from kittens. Molecular testing of fleas demonstrated the presence of R. felis but not R. typhi.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,820,383
of 27,385,731 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#2,094
of 6,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,204
of 202,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,385,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.