↓ Skip to main content

The structural basis of actin filament branching by the Arp2/3 complex

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The structural basis of actin filament branching by the Arp2/3 complex
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1083/jcb.200709092
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex mediates the formation of branched actin filaments at the leading edge of motile cells and in the comet tails moving certain intracellular pathogens. Crystal structures of the Arp2/3 complex are available, but the architecture of the junction formed by the Arp2/3 complex at the base of the branch was not known. In this study, we use electron tomography to reconstruct the branch junction with sufficient resolution to show how the Arp2/3 complex interacts with the mother filament. Our analysis reveals conformational changes in both the mother filament and Arp2/3 complex upon branch formation. The Arp2 and Arp3 subunits reorganize into a dimer, providing a short-pitch template for elongation of the daughter filament. Two subunits of the mother filament undergo conformational changes that increase stability of the branch. These data provide a rationale for why branch formation requires cooperative interactions among the Arp2/3 complex, nucleation-promoting factors, an actin monomer, and the mother filament.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 348 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 28%
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Master 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 76 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 22%
Chemistry 17 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 89 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,507,468
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#1,972
of 13,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,589
of 135,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#5
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.