↓ Skip to main content

Opium Trade, Insurgency, and HIV/AIDS in Afghanistan: Relationships and Regional Consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Opium Trade, Insurgency, and HIV/AIDS in Afghanistan: Relationships and Regional Consequences
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, June 2010
DOI 10.1177/1010539510374524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nevada Griffin, Kaveh Khoshnood

Abstract

Global health and conflict studies share key linkages that have important research and policy implications but for which data are currently lacking. This analytical review examines the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan, using it as a basis to develop a conceptual framework that integrates security and public health concepts. The analysis draws on recent peer-reviewed and gray literature to assess the interrelationship among 3 variable clusters and their impact on the emergence of the HIV epidemic in Afghanistan. The evidence suggests that there is a complex indirect relationship linking illicit opium trade, the ongoing insurgency, and forced and spontaneous migration to the emergence of an injection drug use-driven HIV epidemic in Afghanistan. These findings demonstrate a clear need for an integrated cross-disciplinary and regional approach to the emerging threat of HIV/AIDS in Afghanistan, to inform more balanced and effective policy making in this and other regions of strategic global import.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Librarian 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2026.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#269
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,415
of 150,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.