↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Suppressing the Thermal Metacyclophanediene to Dihydropyrene Isomerization: Synthesis and Rearrangement of 8,16-Dicyano[2.2]metacyclophane-1,9-diene and Evidence Supporting the Proposed Biradicaloid Mechanism
Published in
Journal of Organic Chemistry, December 2007
DOI 10.1021/jo7019459
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Synthesis of 8,16-dicyano-anti-[2.2]metacyclophane-1,9-diene, 1b, was achieved in five steps from 1,3-bis(bromomethyl)benzonitrile. Unlike most metacyclophanedienes which easily thermally isomerize (tau 1/2 = minutes to days at 20 degrees C) to dihydropyrenes 2, dinitrile 1b shows no tendency to convert thermally to 2b at room temperature (tau 1/2 > 30 years), consistent with predictions based on calculation of activation barriers. Irradiation of cyclophanediene 1b with UV light readily forms the dinitriledihydropyrene 2b, which unexpectedly shows a much more facile (50 degrees C) 1,5-sigmatropic rearrangement of the internal nitrile groups to give dihydropyrenes 9b and then 10b than is the case for internal methyl substituents, 2a, which forms 9a at temperatures above 190 degrees C. Synthesis of the 2-formyl derivative 1c and the 2-naphthoyl derivative 1d are also described. These substituents were predicted to lower the activation barrier for the thermal closing reaction to the corresponding dihydropyrenes, and experimental evidence supports these calculations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 34%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 68%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#12,372,536
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Organic Chemistry
#19,786
of 41,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,239
of 225,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Organic Chemistry
#84
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.