↓ Skip to main content

Literature review: do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Literature review: do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 23%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,476,530
of 29,664,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#1,078
of 6,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,748
of 123,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,664,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.