The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of elderly burn victims and to determine an instrument to predict survival in this population. Charts of three hundred and eight burn patients > or =60 yr of age who were admitted to a university-based hospital between the years of 1977-1996 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the population was 71.5+/-8.6, with a male predominance (1.8 to 1, P < 0.001). The majority of the burns were secondary to flame injuries (210, 68.6%). The median body surface area (BSAB) was 13.0% with an in-hospital mortality rate of 30.2%. We demonstrated improved survival in patients aged 60-74 yr as compared to 1965-1971 national burn survival data. A similar trend could not be shown in the very old (> 75 yr of age). Only age and BSAB were related to death by multiple stepwise forward linear regression. The Baux score, which adds age and BSAB, was predictive of outcome in 87.0% of our population. In conclusion, this study reinforces the high mortality associated with burn injuries in the elderly and the superior ability of the Baux score (age + percent burn) in predicting outcome in this population.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,636,736
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Burns (03054179)
#610
of 2,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,427
of 60,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns (03054179)
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
