↓ Skip to main content

Purification and Mechanism of Human Aldehyde Oxidase Expressed in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Purification and Mechanism of Human Aldehyde Oxidase Expressed in Escherichia coli
Published in
Drug Metabolism and Disposition, September 2009
DOI 10.1124/dmd.109.029520
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human aldehyde oxidase 1 (AOX1) has been subcloned into a vector suitable for expression in Escherichia coli, and the protein has been expressed. The resulting protein is active, with sulfur being incorporated in the molybdopterin cofactor. Expression levels are modest, but 1 liter of cells supplies enough protein for both biochemical and kinetic characterization. Partial purification is achieved by nickel affinity chromatography through the addition of six histidines to the amino-terminal end of the protein. Kinetic analysis, including kinetic isotope effects and comparison with xanthine oxidase, reveal similar mechanisms, with some subtle differences. This expression system will allow for the interrogation of human aldehyde oxidase structure/function relationships by site-directed mutagenesis and provide protein for characterizing the role of AOX1 in drug metabolism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Chemistry 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#598
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,533
of 91,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.