↓ Skip to main content

Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-Managed Groups: The Role of Personality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-Managed Groups: The Role of Personality
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 1997
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Using the five factor model with an emphasis on extraversion and conscientiousness, the authors investigated how personality is related to small group processes and outcomes. Graduate students (N = 289) assigned to 4- and 5-person teams in 61 groups engaged in a series of creative problem-solving tasks over a period of several weeks. Extraversion was associated with group processes and outcomes at both individual and group levels of analysis. At the individual level, extraverts were perceived by others as having greater effect than introverts on group outcomes. Covariance structure modeling suggested that extraverts induce these perceptions through the provision of both socioemotional and task-related inputs. At the group level, the proportion of relatively extraverted members was related curvilinearly to task focus and group performance. Contrary to expectations, Conscientiousness was unrelated to processes and outcomes at either the individual or group level.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 396 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 23%
Student > Master 75 18%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 73 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 139 33%
Psychology 95 23%
Social Sciences 32 8%
Engineering 20 5%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 76 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,291
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,874
of 92,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#19
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.