↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic Impediment or Impediment to Taxonomy? A Commentary on Systematics and the Cybertaxonomic-Automation Paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Biology, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
653 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 653 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 41 6%
United States 12 2%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 566 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 136 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 18%
Student > Master 99 15%
Student > Bachelor 62 9%
Professor 44 7%
Other 133 20%
Unknown 60 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 451 69%
Environmental Science 45 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 3%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 33 5%
Unknown 73 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,943,549
of 31,903,846 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#101
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,861
of 117,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,903,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them