↓ Skip to main content

Structural insights into RNA-dependent eukaryal and archaeal selenocysteine formation

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural insights into RNA-dependent eukaryal and archaeal selenocysteine formation
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkm1122
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The micronutrient selenium is present in proteins as selenocysteine (Sec). In eukaryotes and archaea, Sec is formed in a tRNA-dependent conversion of O-phosphoserine (Sep) by O-phosphoseryl-tRNA:selenocysteinyl-tRNA synthase (SepSecS). Here, we present the crystal structure of Methanococcus maripaludis SepSecS complexed with PLP at 2.5 A resolution. SepSecS, a member of the Fold Type I PLP enzyme family, forms an (alpha2)2 homotetramer through its N-terminal extension. The active site lies on the dimer interface with each monomer contributing essential residues. In contrast to other Fold Type I PLP enzymes, Asn247 in SepSecS replaces the conserved Asp in binding the pyridinium nitrogen of PLP. A structural comparison with Escherichia coli selenocysteine lyase allowed construction of a model of Sep binding to the SepSecS catalytic site. Mutations of three conserved active site arginines (Arg72, Arg94, Arg307), protruding from the neighboring subunit, led to loss of in vivo and in vitro activity. The lack of active site cysteines demonstrates that a perselenide is not involved in SepSecS-catalyzed Sec formation; instead, the conserved arginines may facilitate the selenation reaction. Structural phylogeny shows that SepSecS evolved early in the history of PLP enzymes, and indicates that tRNA-dependent Sec formation is a primordial process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Professor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2026.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#12,416
of 26,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,569
of 155,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#77
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.