↓ Skip to main content

High-energy-density extended CO solid

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High-energy-density extended CO solid
Published in
Nature Materials, February 2005
DOI 10.1038/nmat1321
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Covalently bonded extended phases of molecular solids made of first- and second-row elements at high pressures are a new class of materials with advanced optical, mechanical and energetic properties. The existence of such extended solids has recently been demonstrated using diamond anvil cells in several systems, including nitrogen, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. However, the microscopic quantities produced at the formidable high-pressure/temperature conditions have limited the characterization of their predicted novel properties, including high-energy content. In this paper, we present experimental evidence that these extended low-Z solids are indeed high-energy-density materials, by milligram-scale high-pressure synthesis, recovery and characterization of polymeric CO (p-CO). Our spectroscopic data reveal that p-CO is a random polymer made of lactonic entities and conjugated C=C with an energy content rivalling or exceeding that of HMX (cyclo-tetramethylene tetranitramine, a commonly used conventional high explosive). Solid p-CO explosively decomposes to CO(2) and glassy carbon, and thus might be used as an advanced energetic material.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 15 27%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 18 33%
Chemistry 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Materials Science 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,533,546
of 33,403,089 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#2,229
of 5,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,322
of 213,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,403,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.