↓ Skip to main content

A TALE of Two Nucleases: Gene Targeting for the Masses?

Overview of attention for article published in Zebrafish, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 526)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
77 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A TALE of Two Nucleases: Gene Targeting for the Masses?
Published in
Zebrafish, September 2011
DOI 10.1089/zeb.2011.9993
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genome editing appears poised to enter an exciting new era. Targeted double-stranded breaks due to custom restriction enzymes are powerful nucleating events for the induction of local changes in the genome. The zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) platform established the potential of this approach for the zebrafish, but access to high quality reagents has been a major bottleneck for the field. However, two groups recently report successful somatic and germline gene modification using a new nuclease architecture, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). TALEN construction is simpler, potentially more reliable, and in the few cases examined, shows fewer off-target effects than corresponding ZFNs. TALENs promise to bring gene targeting to the majority of zebrafish laboratories.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 170 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Student > Master 27 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 13 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 14 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,516,393
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Zebrafish
#16
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,077
of 172,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zebrafish
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them