| Title |
An Automated Design Framework for Multicellular Recombinase Logic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Synthetic Biology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Tools to systematically reprogram cellular behavior are crucial to address pressing challenges in manufacturing, the environment, or healthcare. Recombinases can very efficiently encode Boolean and history-dependent logic in many species, yet current designs are performed on a case-by-case basis, limiting their scalability and requiring time-consuming optimization. Here we present an automated workflow for designing recombinase logic devices executing Boolean functions. Our theoretical framework uses a reduced library of computational modules distributed into different cellular subpopulations which are then composed in various manners to implement all desired logic functions at the multicellular level. Our design platform called CALIN (Composable Asynchronous Logic using Integrase Networks) is broadly accessible via a web server taking truth tables as inputs and providing corresponding DNA designs and sequences as outputs (available at: http:/synbio.cbs.cnrs.fr/calin). |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |