Title |
Accidental, unprepared, and unsupported: clinical nurses becoming managers
|
---|---|
Published in |
The International Journal of Human Resource Management, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1080/09585192.2011.610963 |
Authors |
Keith Townsend, Adrian Wilkinson, Greg Bamber, Cameron Allan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 29% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Human Resource Management
#275
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,817
of 244,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Human Resource Management
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.