↓ Skip to main content

A Surface Energy Transfer Nanoruler for Measuring Binding Site Distances on Live Cell Surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Surface Energy Transfer Nanoruler for Measuring Binding Site Distances on Live Cell Surfaces
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2010
DOI 10.1021/ja106360v
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Measuring distances at molecular length scales in living systems is a significant challenge. Methods like Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) have limitations due to short detection distances and strict orientations. Recently, surface energy transfer (SET) has been used in bulk solutions; however, it cannot be applied to living systems. Here, we have developed an SET nanoruler, using aptamer-gold nanoparticle conjugates with different diameters, to monitor the distance between binding sites of a receptor on living cells. The nanoruler can measure separation distances well beyond the detection limit of FRET. Thus, for the first time, we have developed an effective SET nanoruler for live cells with long distance, easy construction, fast detection, and low background. This is also the first time that the distance between the aptamer and antibody binding sites in the membrane protein PTK7 was measured accurately. The SET nanoruler represents the next leap forward to monitor structural components within living cell membranes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 27 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 15%
Physics and Astronomy 15 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Materials Science 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2025.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#28,449
of 61,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,987
of 100,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#192
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.