↓ Skip to main content

The Challenge of Drugging Undruggable Targets in Cancer: Lessons Learned from Targeting BCL-2 Family Members

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
55 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Challenge of Drugging Undruggable Targets in Cancer: Lessons Learned from Targeting BCL-2 Family Members
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-2184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory L. Verdine, Loren D. Walensky

Abstract

The genomic and proteomic revolutions have provided us with an ever-increasing number of mechanistic insights into cancer pathogenesis. Mutated genes and pathologic protein products have emerged as the basis for modern anticancer drug development. With the increasing realization of the importance of disrupting oncogenic protein-protein interaction, new challenges have emerged for classical small molecule and protein-based drug modalities, i.e., the critical need to target flat and extended protein surfaces. Here, we highlight two distinct technologies that are being used to bridge the pharmacologic gap between small molecules and protein therapeutics. With the BCL-2 family of survival proteins as their substrate for intracellular targeting, we conclude that peptide stapling and fragment-based drug discovery show promise to traverse the critical surface features of proteins that drive human cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 389 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 27%
Researcher 76 19%
Student > Master 32 8%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 79 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 113 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 4%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 83 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#452,093
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#244
of 12,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,058
of 160,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#2
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.