↓ Skip to main content

Metal stoichiometry and functional studies of the diphtheria toxin repressor

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Metal stoichiometry and functional studies of the diphtheria toxin repressor
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0737977100
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diphtheria toxin repressor (DtxR) is a transition metal ion-activated repressor in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. DtxR is an iron sensor; metal-bound DtxR represses transcription of genes downstream of the tox operator. Wild-type DtxR [DtxR(wt)] and several mutant forms were overexpressed and purified from Escherichia coli. DtxR was isolated without bound metal. Metal reconstitution gave a binding stoichiometry of 2 per monomer for DtxR(wt) and 1 per monomer for DtxR(H79A) and DtxR(M10A). DNA binding of DtxR(H79A) and DtxR(M10A) indicates that metal site 2 is essential for activity. Metal binding lowers the dimerization K(d) of DtxR from low micromolar to 33 nM. Gel electrophoretic mobility-shift assays show that Fe(2+) and not Fe(3+) activates DtxR for DNA binding. This finding suggests that gene regulation by DtxR may be sensitive not only to iron levels but also to redox state of the iron. Mutations in the tox operator sequence indicate that DtxR dimers binding to DNA may be highly cooperative.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#11,901,090
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#82,553
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,844
of 90,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#417
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.