↓ Skip to main content

Religious Involvement and Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Health Psychology, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
5 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Religious Involvement and Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Published in
Health Psychology, January 2000
DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.211
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A meta-analysis of data from 42 independent samples examining the association of a measure of religious involvement and all-cause mortality is reported. Religious involvement was significantly associated with lower mortality (odds ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.39), indicating that people high in religious involvement were more likely to be alive at follow-up than people lower in religious involvement. Although the strength of the religious involvement-mortality association varied as a function of several moderator variables, the association of religious involvement and mortality was robust and on the order of magnitude that has come to be expected for psychosocial factors. Conclusions did not appear to be due to publication bias.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 241 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Master 25 10%
Professor 22 9%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 71 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 17%
Social Sciences 35 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 68 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,626,581
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology
#266
of 3,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,929
of 156,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology
#4
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.