↓ Skip to main content

Warmer weather as a risk factor for hospitalisations due to urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology & Infection, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Warmer weather as a risk factor for hospitalisations due to urinary tract infections
Published in
Epidemiology & Infection, January 2018
DOI 10.1017/s0950268817002965
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is seasonal, and this seasonality may be explained by changes in weather, specifically, temperature. Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified the geographic location for 581 813 hospital admissions with the primary diagnosis of a UTI and 56 630 773 non-UTI hospitalisations in the United States. Next, we used data from the National Climatic Data Center to estimate the monthly average temperature for each location. Using a case-control design, we modelled the odds of a hospital admission having a primary diagnosis of UTI as a function of demographics, payer, location, patient severity, admission month, year and the average temperature for the admission month. We found, after controlling for patient factors and month of admission, the odds of a UTI diagnosis increased with higher temperatures in a dose-dependent manner. For example, relative to months with average temperatures of 5-7.5 °C, an admission in a month with an average temperature of 27.5-30 °C has 20% higher odds of a primary diagnosis of UTI. However, in months with extremely high average temperatures (above 30 °C), the odds of a UTI admissions decrease, perhaps due to changes in behaviour. Thus, at a population level, UTI-related hospitalisations are associated with warmer weather.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 39 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#28,640,276
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology & Infection
#4,103
of 4,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397,713
of 496,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology & Infection
#40
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.