↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Callous–Unemotional Traits for Extending the Concept of Psychopathy to Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Abnormal Psychology, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Importance of Callous–Unemotional Traits for Extending the Concept of Psychopathy to Children
Published in
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, May 2000
DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.109.2.335
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study focused on the use of callous-unemotional (CU) traits to identify a subgroup of children with both attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and a conduct problem diagnosis (oppositional defiant disorder [ODD] or conduct disorder [CD] who show characteristics similar to adults with psychopathy. In a clinic-referred sample of children aged 6 to 13 years (N = 154), those with diagnoses of both ADHD and ODD/CD were divided on the basis of teacher ratings of CU traits. Children high on these traits showed features typically associated with psychopathy, such as a lack of fearfulness and a reward-dominant response style. Furthermore, children with CU traits seemed less distressed by their behavior problems. These findings are consistent with research on adults showing that impulsivity and antisocial behavior alone are insufficient to document persons who fit the construct of psychopathy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 207 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2026.
All research outputs
#3,465,649
of 32,004,021 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Abnormal Psychology
#329
of 2,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,974
of 55,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Abnormal Psychology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,004,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.