↓ Skip to main content

HDEA, a periplasmic protein that supports acid resistance in pathogenic enteric bacteria11Edited by P. E. Wright

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HDEA, a periplasmic protein that supports acid resistance in pathogenic enteric bacteria11Edited by P. E. Wright
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2000
DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3347
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The X-ray crystal structure of the Escherichia coli stress response protein HDEA has been determined at 2.0 A resolution. The single domain alpha-helical protein is found in the periplasmic space, where it supports an acid resistance phenotype essential for infectivity of enteric bacterial pathogens, such as Shigella and E. coli. Functional studies demonstrate that HDEA is activated by a dimer-to-monomer transition at acidic pH, leading to suppression of aggregation by acid-denatured proteins. We suggest that HDEA may support chaperone-like functions during the extremely acidic conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Chemistry 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,215,144
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#1,231
of 12,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,653
of 119,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#10
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.