↓ Skip to main content

The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
9 policy sources
patent
119 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3698 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials
Published in
Science, January 2006
DOI 10.1126/science.1114736
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Biomass represents an abundant carbon-neutral renewable resource for the production of bioenergy and biomaterials, and its enhanced use would address several societal needs. Advances in genetics, biotechnology, process chemistry, and engineering are leading to a new manufacturing concept for converting renewable biomass to valuable fuels and products, generally referred to as the biorefinery. The integration of agroenergy crops and biorefinery manufacturing technologies offers the potential for the development of sustainable biopower and biomaterials that will lead to a new manufacturing paradigm.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,698 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 35 <1%
United Kingdom 14 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Denmark 8 <1%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Belgium 5 <1%
Portugal 5 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Other 48 1%
Unknown 3552 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 718 19%
Researcher 501 14%
Student > Master 462 12%
Student > Bachelor 323 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 169 5%
Other 538 15%
Unknown 987 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 601 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 531 14%
Engineering 409 11%
Chemical Engineering 273 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 201 5%
Other 549 15%
Unknown 1134 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2026.
All research outputs
#1,003,326
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Science
#18,649
of 93,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,264
of 227,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#32
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.