↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of methods for evaluating healthcare research economic impact

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Systematic review of methods for evaluating healthcare research economic impact
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-8-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Reza Majdzadeh, Hojat Salmasian

Abstract

The economic benefits of healthcare research require study so that appropriate resources can be allocated to this research, particularly in developing countries. As a first step, we performed a systematic review to identify the methods used to assess the economic impact of healthcare research, and the outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,598,001
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#381
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,912
of 95,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them