↓ Skip to main content

SeqEM: an adaptive genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SeqEM: an adaptive genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies
Published in
Bioinformatics, September 2010
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq526
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Next-generation sequencing presents several statistical challenges, with one of the most fundamental being determining an individual's genotype from multiple aligned short read sequences at a position. Some simple approaches for genotype calling apply fixed filters, such as calling a heterozygote if more than a specified percentage of the reads have variant nucleotide calls. Other genotype-calling methods, such as MAQ and SOAPsnp, are implementations of Bayes classifiers in that they classify genotypes using posterior genotype probabilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 14 6%
Brazil 3 1%
Belgium 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 195 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 20%
Student > Master 22 9%
Professor 17 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 18 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Computer Science 13 6%
Mathematics 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 24 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2025.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#3,394
of 12,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,019
of 106,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#13
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.