↓ Skip to main content

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Women's Shoe Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Foot & Ankle International, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 2,495)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Women's Shoe Survey
Published in
Foot & Ankle International, February 1993
DOI 10.1177/107110079301400204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Frey, Francesca Thompson, Judith Smith, Melanie Sanders, Helen Horstman

Abstract

Shoes have been implicated as being responsible for the majority of foot deformities and problems that physicians encounter in women. A total of 356 women were studied in this investigation to evaluate trends in women's shoe wear and their effect on the development of foot deformities and pain. The majority of women in this study wore shoes that were too small for their feet, had foot pain and deformity, and had increased shoe size since the age of 20. Few women had their feet measured in over 5 years. The women without foot pain or deformities also wore shoes that were smaller than their feet but to a lesser degree.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2026.
All research outputs
#1,064,606
of 34,186,604 outputs
Outputs from Foot & Ankle International
#37
of 2,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#416
of 94,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foot & Ankle International
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,186,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them