↓ Skip to main content

Using Informant and Performance Screening Methods to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Geriatrics Reports, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 154)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Informant and Performance Screening Methods to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Published in
Current Geriatrics Reports, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13670-018-0236-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dementia detection in the community is challenging. The purpose of this paper is to review methods of dementia screening and provide a useable algorithm for screening for dementia a variety of clinical settings. In recent years, a number of brief performance and informant-based assessments have been developed and validated in research, clinical, and community samples. These assessments are now complemented by patient self-reports that afford the ability to detect subjective cognitive impairment. An optimal approach to dementia screening is to combine performance, informant, and self-reports, many of which can be completed in the waiting room or by non-physician staff prior to the start of the office visit. This diverse information may help inform the provider as to the presence or absence of a cognitive disorder, assist in staging the extent of the disorder, and help to develop a differential diagnosis and management plan.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 26 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#10,325,337
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Current Geriatrics Reports
#41
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,215
of 491,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Geriatrics Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.