↓ Skip to main content

Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Published in
Current Biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.077
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) activates the Ser/Thr kinase Aurora A in mitosis and targets it to the mitotic spindle [1, 2]. These effects on Aurora A are mediated by the N-terminal domain of TPX2, whereas a C-terminal fragment has been reported to affect microtubule nucleation [3]. Using the Xenopus system, we identified a novel role of TPX2 during mitosis. Injection of TPX2 or its C terminus (TPX2-CT) into blastomeres of two-cell embryos led to potent cleavage arrest. Despite cleavage arrest, TPX2-injected embryos biochemically undergo multiple rounds of DNA synthesis and mitosis, and arrested blastomeres have abnormal spindles, clustered centrosomes, and an apparent failure of cytokinesis. In Xenopus S3 cells, transfection of TPX2-FL causes spindle collapse, whereas TPX2-CT blocks pole segregation, resulting in apposing spindle poles with no evident displacement of Aurora A. Analysis of TPX2-CT deletion peptides revealed that only constructs able to interact with the class 5 kinesin-like motor protein Eg5 induce the spindle phenotypes. Importantly, injection of Eg5 into TPX2-CT-arrested blastomeres causes resumption of cleavage. These results define a discrete domain within the C terminus of TPX2 that exerts a novel Eg5-dependent function in spindle pole segregation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 30%
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 33%
Chemistry 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#9,719
of 14,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,611
of 95,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#51
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.