↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in the Zinc Finger Protein Gene, ZNF469, Contribute to the Pathogenesis of KeratoconusMutations in ZNF469 Contribute to Keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutations in the Zinc Finger Protein Gene, ZNF469, Contribute to the Pathogenesis of KeratoconusMutations in ZNF469 Contribute to Keratoconus
Published in
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1167/iovs.14-14532
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mutations in the zinc finger protein gene ZNF469 cause recessive brittle cornea syndrome, characterized by spontaneous corneal perforations. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated common variants in this gene as a determinant for central corneal thickness (CCT). We investigated the contribution of ZNF469 in a sample set of keratoconus patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,319,939
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#2,170
of 13,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,343
of 272,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#29
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.