↓ Skip to main content

Somatic alterations of CDKN1B are associated with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Genetics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 104)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Somatic alterations of CDKN1B are associated with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
Published in
Cancer Genetics, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CDKN1B, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor associated with G1 arrest, was recently proposed as an important tumor suppressor gene in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). The rate of frameshift mutations in SBNET primaries are reportedly 7.4%, and hemizygous deletions are 6.7%. We set out to confirm the role of CDKN1B mutations and copy number variants (CNVs) in primary SBNETs, and whether these are also found in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Genomic DNA was isolated from 90 primary SBNETs and 67 PNETs. Coding exons of CDKN1B were amplified by PCR and sequenced. CNV analysis was performed by quantitative PCR, p27 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. In SBNETS, three frameshifts, one missense mutation, and three CNVs were observed. The total rate of CDKN1B alterations was 7.0% (6 of 86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-4.4%). The frameshift rate was 3.5% (95% CI 1.1-9.8%). One SBNET patient had a hemizygous deletion of CDKN1B, and two patients had duplications (3.4%; 95% CI -0.41-7.2%). One PNET patient had a duplication, and two patients had hemizygous deletions (4.8%; 95% CI -0.44-10%). Alterations of cell-cycle control due to alterations in CDKN1B may be one mechanism by which SBNETs develop, which could have implications for new treatment modalities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Unspecified 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2026.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Genetics
#36
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,476
of 283,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Genetics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.