↓ Skip to main content

Design, Synthesis, and Cardioprotective Effects of N‑Mercapto-Based Hydrogen Sulfide Donors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Design, Synthesis, and Cardioprotective Effects of N‑Mercapto-Based Hydrogen Sulfide Donors
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, August 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01033
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a signaling molecule which plays regulatory roles in many physiological and/or pathological processes. Therefore, regulation of H2S levels could have great potential therapeutic value. In this work we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a class of N-mercapto (N-SH)-based H2S donors. Thirty three donors were synthesized and tested. Our results indicated that controllable H2S release from these donors could be achieved upon structural modifications. Selected donors (NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6) were tested in cellular models of oxidative damage and showed significant cytoprotective effects. Moreover, NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 were also found to exhibit potent protective effects in a murine model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MI/R) injury.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 32%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 27 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#12,311,486
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#19,974
of 28,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,720
of 305,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#127
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.