↓ Skip to main content

Using synthetic oligonucleotides as standards in probe-based qPCR

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechniques, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using synthetic oligonucleotides as standards in probe-based qPCR
Published in
Biotechniques, April 2018
DOI 10.2144/btn-2018-2000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Real-time PCR (qPCR) is widely used in the life sciences. For quantifying DNA, a standard curve is required. Common methods for standard development are time consuming, costly, necessitate a specific skill set, and pose a contamination risk. Using a targeted synthetic oligonucleotide, such as a gBlocks® Gene Fragment, overcomes these drawbacks and provides researchers an accurate and quick solution to standard development. Here, we demonstrate that using a gBlocks fragment as a standard provides comparable sensitivity, reliability, and assay performance to a purified amplicon standard.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 56 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Environmental Science 13 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 58 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,819,935
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Biotechniques
#1,231
of 3,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,941
of 372,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechniques
#229
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.