↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Mortality Associated with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
828 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of Mortality Associated with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2002
DOI 10.1086/345476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 828 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 805 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 123 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 13%
Student > Master 101 12%
Researcher 88 11%
Other 63 8%
Other 172 21%
Unknown 170 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 246 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 58 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 3%
Other 102 12%
Unknown 201 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2025.
All research outputs
#914,189
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,587
of 20,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,340
of 187,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#5
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.