↓ Skip to main content

Functional subdivision of the human periaqueductal grey in respiratory control using 7tesla fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional subdivision of the human periaqueductal grey in respiratory control using 7tesla fMRI
Published in
NeuroImage, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The periaqueductal grey (PAG) is a nucleus within the midbrain, and evidence from animal models has identified its role in many homeostatic systems including respiration. Animal models have also demonstrated a columnar structure that subdivides the PAG into four columns on each side, and these subdivisions have different functions with regard to respiration. In this study we used ultra-high field functional MRI (7T) to image the brainstem and superior cortical areas at high resolution (1mm(3)voxels), aiming to identify activation within the columns of the PAG associated with respiratory control. Our results showed a deactivation in the lateral and dorsomedial columns of the PAG corresponding with short (~10s) breath holds, along with cortical activations consistent with previous respiratory imaging studies. These results demonstrate the involvement of the lateral and dorsomedial PAG in the network of conscious respiratory control for the first time in humans. This study also reveals the opportunities of 7tesla functional MRI for non-invasively investigating human brainstem nuclei at high-resolutions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 23 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Psychology 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#5,773
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,266
of 269,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#74
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.