↓ Skip to main content

First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 8,701)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns
Published in
Human Reproduction, February 2015
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deu363
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. H. Swan, S. Sathyanarayana, E. S. Barrett, S. Janssen, F. Liu, R. H. N. Nguyen, J. B. Redmon, the TIDES Study Team, F. Liu, E. Scher, M. Stasenko, E. Ayash, M. Schirmer, J. Farrell, M.-P. Thiet, L. Baskin, H. L. Gray Chelsea Georgesen, B. J. Rody, C. A. Terrell, K. Kaur, E. Brantley, H. Fiore, L. Kochman, L. Parlett, J. Marino, W. Hulbert, R. Mevorach, E. Pressman, K. Ivicek, B. Salveson, G. Alcedo

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 278 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 77 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 12%
Environmental Science 20 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 98 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2026.
All research outputs
#81,967
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction
#50
of 8,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#681
of 295,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.