↓ Skip to main content

Analyses of the mitochondrial genome of Leiopelma hochstetteri argues against the full drowning of New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biogeography, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analyses of the mitochondrial genome of Leiopelma hochstetteri argues against the full drowning of New Zealand
Published in
Journal of Biogeography, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/jbi.12482
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#19,218,633
of 27,879,946 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biogeography
#3,007
of 3,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,341
of 271,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biogeography
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,879,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.