↓ Skip to main content

Maternal selenium status during early gestation and risk for preterm birth

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maternal selenium status during early gestation and risk for preterm birth
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.101095
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Preterm birth occurs in 5%-13% of pregnancies. It is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity and has adverse long-term consequences for the health of the child. Because of the role selenium plays in attenuating inflammation, and because low concentrations of selenium have been found in women with preeclampsia, we hypothesized that low maternal selenium status during early gestation would increase the risk of preterm birth.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,394,923
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,453
of 11,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,814
of 257,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#35
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.