↓ Skip to main content

Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities
Published in
Scientometrics, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1483-4
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 7 13%
Librarian 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Computer Science 13 24%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,270
of 2,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,241
of 362,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#41
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.